This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
wiki:development:roadmap [2015/02/05 08:53] stefanbaur |
wiki:development:roadmap [2017/05/11 09:45] stefanbaur New section: NX-Libs (missing) features table |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== | + | ====== |
- | * [[wiki: | + | {{:wiki: |
- | * [[wiki: | + | * [[wiki: |
- | * [[wiki: | + | * [[wiki: |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
====== X2Go Roadmap ====== | ====== X2Go Roadmap ====== | ||
Line 23: | Line 28: | ||
At present, X2GoClient on OS X goes into an endless loop and has to be force-terminated after the second or third connection attempt. | At present, X2GoClient on OS X goes into an endless loop and has to be force-terminated after the second or third connection attempt. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Task assigned to: Mihai | ||
**Run multiple instances of X2GoClient**, | **Run multiple instances of X2GoClient**, | ||
Line 70: | Line 77: | ||
Task assigned to: Stefan, aided by Mike#1 (hard to say, Mike#1 will coach Stefan for an equivalent of 4h to get things straight, no matter how long it takes) | Task assigned to: Stefan, aided by Mike#1 (hard to say, Mike#1 will coach Stefan for an equivalent of 4h to get things straight, no matter how long it takes) | ||
- | < | + | < |
If budget remains, a HTML5 client would be nice. | If budget remains, a HTML5 client would be nice. | ||
+ | |||
//There seems to be a disagreement amongst the developers regarding how such a client should be implemented.// | //There seems to be a disagreement amongst the developers regarding how such a client should be implemented.// | ||
+ | - One option would be to copy what other remote solutions are using - which means sub-par performance compared to our native NX/X2Go speeds. | ||
+ | - A from-scratch approach would bring native speeds, but is a time and money sinkhole. | ||
Task assigned to: <none yet> - could be Alex, Mihai, ...? | Task assigned to: <none yet> - could be Alex, Mihai, ...? | ||
- | < | + | < |
h1 has some ideas what other F/LOSS codebases might be suitable as a time- and money-saving alternative to doing the NX-Rewrite. | h1 has some ideas what other F/LOSS codebases might be suitable as a time- and money-saving alternative to doing the NX-Rewrite. | ||
Line 189: | Line 199: | ||
+ | ==== first attempt at documenting missing NX-libs features for certain applications and desktop environments ==== | ||
+ | ^Feature/ | ||
+ | |XServer: RANDR| | | | | ||
+ | |XServer: RENDER| | | | | ||
+ | |XServer: Composite| | | | | ||
+ | |XServer: GLX| | | | | ||
+ | |XServer: DRI| | | | | ||
+ | |XServer: BIGREQUESTS| | | | | ||
+ | |Client: libXrandr| | | | | ||
+ | |Client: libXrender| | | | | ||
+ | |Xinerama| | | | | ||
+ | |MESA| | | | | ||
+ | |VirtualGL| | | | | ||