This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
wiki:development:roadmap [2015/01/26 11:14] stefanbaur [Sponsored Improvement Requests] Mockup Images added |
wiki:development:roadmap [2015/01/27 11:23] stefanbaur |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
**Improve x2go-broker functionality (shadowing, stable release)** | **Improve x2go-broker functionality (shadowing, stable release)** | ||
- | Task assigned to: Mike#1 | + | Task assigned to: Mike# |
**Improve x2go-broker documentation** | **Improve x2go-broker documentation** | ||
- | Task assigned to: Mike#1, Stefan | + | Task assigned to: Mike#1, Stefan |
**General improvement on documentation** | **General improvement on documentation** | ||
- | Task assigned to: Stefan, aided by Mike#1 | + | Task assigned to: Stefan, aided by Mike# |
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | If budget remains, a HTML5 client would be nice. | ||
+ | //There seems to be a disagreement amongst the developers regarding how such a client should be implemented.// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Task assigned to: <none yet> - could be Alex, Mihai, ...? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
- | **Alternative to NX-Rewrite** | ||
h1 has some ideas what other F/LOSS codebases might be suitable as a time- and money-saving alternative to doing the NX-Rewrite. | h1 has some ideas what other F/LOSS codebases might be suitable as a time- and money-saving alternative to doing the NX-Rewrite. | ||
He should mention them on x2go-dev to get more feedback, then a competent C/C++ coder should look at the alternatives and evaluate them for suitability. | He should mention them on x2go-dev to get more feedback, then a competent C/C++ coder should look at the alternatives and evaluate them for suitability. |