This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
doc:wiki:discussion [2012/03/06 21:49] tan [Realtime Contribution] |
doc:wiki:discussion [2012/03/06 22:11] tan [Documentation vs. Wiki] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
===== Only Tested Articles ===== | ===== Only Tested Articles ===== | ||
Not tested or poorly tested setups should definately be marked as " | Not tested or poorly tested setups should definately be marked as " | ||
+ | * [ [[teranders@gmail.com|Terje Andersen]] ] yes, sounds like a good a idea. I think we should go for the " | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
* [ [[mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de|Mike Gabriel]] ] Use dokuwiki offline plugin, find a doku2pdf (or docbook XML or ...) converter | * [ [[mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de|Mike Gabriel]] ] Use dokuwiki offline plugin, find a doku2pdf (or docbook XML or ...) converter | ||
+ | * [ [[Teranders@gmail.com|Terje Andersen]] ] We could present a button for creating the pdf as Mike here suggests. Additionally we could regularly produce a snapshot of the wiki which is further tailored (handcrafted pdf) for different readers, like system administrators, | ||
===== Wiki Layout ===== | ===== Wiki Layout ===== | ||
Line 86: | Line 87: | ||
* [ [[bd.dali@gmail.com|Daniel Lindgren]] ] I suggest that X2Go's wiki is changed to use either the default DokuWiki template (as seen on [[http:// | * [ [[bd.dali@gmail.com|Daniel Lindgren]] ] I suggest that X2Go's wiki is changed to use either the default DokuWiki template (as seen on [[http:// | ||
+ | * [ [[Teranders@gmail.com|Terje Andersen]] ] I agree with Daniel here, of the two mentioned here I would choose the Arctic theme. | ||
---- | ---- | ||