User Tools

Site Tools


doc:wiki:discussion

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
doc:wiki:discussion [2012/02/21 09:02]
sunweaver [Index Sites]
doc:wiki:discussion [2012/03/06 22:11]
tan [Documentation vs. Wiki]
Line 25: Line 25:
 Index/start pages should be available for every namespace. Those start pages should technically all be the same.  Those pages should definetely be plugin-independent (i.e. not using any dokuwiki plugin). Index/start pages should be available for every namespace. Those start pages should technically all be the same.  Those pages should definetely be plugin-independent (i.e. not using any dokuwiki plugin).
  
-  * [ [[heinz-m.graesing@obviously-nice.de|Heinz-Markus Graesing]] ] I don't think the graphical menues are a good idea. I would prefer some really clean index page with only one information per line.+  * [ [[heinz-m.graesing@obviously-nice.de|Heinz-M. Graesing]] ] I don't think the graphical menues are a good idea. I would prefer some really clean index page with only one information per line.
  
 ---- ----
Line 56: Line 56:
 **Survey:** **Survey:**
  
-  * [ [[mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de|Mike Gabriel]] ] +1+  * [ [[mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de|Mike Gabriel]] ] +1 (yes, and only with commit mails of recent changes to the x2go-commits mailing list) 
 +  * [ [[teranders@gmail.com|Terje Andersen]] ] yes, this is a wiki; if something goes wrong revert to earlier versions. Can we get some sorts of conclusion on where to send mail with info regarding changes made ?
  
 ---- ----
Line 70: Line 71:
 ===== Only Tested Articles ===== ===== Only Tested Articles =====
 Not tested or poorly tested setups should definately be marked as "suggestion" or "untested setup". Not tested or poorly tested setups should definately be marked as "suggestion" or "untested setup".
 +  *  [ [[teranders@gmail.com|Terje Andersen]] ] yes, sounds like a good a idea. I think we should go for the "untested setup" of those two proposed, and maybe use the "Warning" sign in red, as seen on the template example page?
 ---- ----
  
Line 79: Line 80:
  
   * [ [[mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de|Mike Gabriel]] ] Use dokuwiki offline plugin, find a doku2pdf (or docbook XML or ...) converter   * [ [[mike.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de|Mike Gabriel]] ] Use dokuwiki offline plugin, find a doku2pdf (or docbook XML or ...) converter
 +  *  [ [[Teranders@gmail.com|Terje Andersen]] ] We could present a button for creating the pdf as Mike here suggests. Additionally we could regularly produce a snapshot of the wiki which is further tailored (handcrafted pdf) for different readers, like system administrators, users, developers and so forth. I would like us to start "small" with the first suggestion though ;-)
  
 ===== Wiki Layout ===== ===== Wiki Layout =====
Line 84: Line 86:
 A lot of the contributing people would like to have a more wiki like page template. The logo bar should be removed and the layout should be spread over the whole page. The CSS file should not modify the major tags like h1, h2, P or SPAN - this should be in the hand of the user (configuration of the client/Browser). A lot of the contributing people would like to have a more wiki like page template. The logo bar should be removed and the layout should be spread over the whole page. The CSS file should not modify the major tags like h1, h2, P or SPAN - this should be in the hand of the user (configuration of the client/Browser).
  
 +  * [ [[bd.dali@gmail.com|Daniel Lindgren]] ] I suggest that X2Go's wiki is changed to use either the default DokuWiki template (as seen on  [[http://www.dokuwiki.org/dokuwiki|www.dokuwiki.org]]) or, if sidebar(s) is wanted, [[http://www.dokuwiki.org/template:arctic|Arctic template]]. 
 +  * [ [[Teranders@gmail.com|Terje Andersen]] ] I agree with Daniel here, of the two mentioned here I would choose the Arctic theme. 
 ---- ----
- 
-