This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
doc:faq:start [2015/08/21 00:36] mikedep333 NX FAQ -> NX Protocol FAQ |
doc:faq:start [2015/08/21 01:28] mikedep333 [Can I install FreeNX and X2Go Server on one system?] Updates for 3.5.0.x, upstream development, and NX3 discontinuation |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
No. It is not possible to use NX client to log on to an X2Go server and vice versa. | No. It is not possible to use NX client to log on to an X2Go server and vice versa. | ||
- | Even though | + | X2Go does use the same libraries |
X2Go also performs SSH authentication in a different manner than NoMachine does. | X2Go also performs SSH authentication in a different manner than NoMachine does. | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==== Can I install FreeNX and X2Go Server on one system? ==== | ==== Can I install FreeNX and X2Go Server on one system? ==== | ||
- | Yes - the NX libraries of X2Go are actually the most recent versions of NXv3 libs available | + | Yes - the NX libraries of X2Go are actually the most recent |
- | + | ||
- | Due to these circumstances in the future the X2Go project will be upstream source for NXv3 libs for quite some distributions like Debian or Ubuntu. | + | |
In former times the NX libs shipped with X2Go installed into an X2Go' | In former times the NX libs shipped with X2Go installed into an X2Go' | ||
Line 22: | Line 20: | ||
Nowadays the NX libs shipped with X2Go work as a replacement for the NXv3 that are not maintained by NoMachine anymore. | Nowadays the NX libs shipped with X2Go work as a replacement for the NXv3 that are not maintained by NoMachine anymore. | ||
- | (This FAQ article has been written by Mike Gabriel, if someone does not agree with the given information on NoMachine, please be so kind to contact | + | (This FAQ article has been written by Mike Gabriel |
- | ==== Why are you using the terms " | + | ==== Why are you using the terms " |
Basically: | Basically: | ||
Line 45: | Line 43: | ||
Having separate tarballs made maintenance more difficult, so they were combined into one as the X2Go project started redistributing them. | Having separate tarballs made maintenance more difficult, so they were combined into one as the X2Go project started redistributing them. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Why not just use X11 forwarding over SSH? This is what Keith Package recommended. ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | You are probably referring to the [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | It is true that X11 forwarding' | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, nx-libs performs 3 additional performance improvements: | ||
+ | |||
+ | - nx-libs caches images, so that they do not have to be resent. For example, opening up your "start menu" is very fast the 2nd and 3rd time that you do so. | ||
+ | - zlib is generic lossless compression, | ||
+ | - XCB applications are still partially hindered by round-trips, | ||
+ | |||
+ | The 1st 2 performance improvements also reduce bandwidth usage; which has the effect of improving performance when other users are sharing the same WAN link. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Why Am I told to enable X11 forwarding with X2Go? I thought that X2Go uses nx-libs instead of X11 forwarding! ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The simple answer is that the OpenSSH server treats the connection differently (in such a way that degrades nx-libs performance) unless X11 forwarding is enabled. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
==== What is the difference to LTSP? Why a free thin client environment? | ==== What is the difference to LTSP? Why a free thin client environment? |